A San Luis Obispo County Superior Court judge has thrown out a lawsuit filed by Oceano Nursery owner Bill Bookout against numerous agencies and businesses, partly because the judge believed the evidence Bookout presented was insufficient.

Judge Martin Tangeman handed down his 14-page ruling Tuesday, finding in favor of the defendants — Caltrans, Oceano Community Services District, Union Pacific Railroad, Pismo/Oceano Vegetable Exchange and San Luis Obispo County — and against Bookout’s claims that those agencies had caused flooding at his nursery.

Bookout wanted to see the issue go to a jury trial, but the judge ruled otherwise.

On Wednesday morning, Bookout said he plans to appeal the ruling in what he sees as a fight for Oceano, so the community doesn’t have to pay for others’ mistakes.

“This is a community problem ... that has put my business out of business,” said Bookout, who also is a member of the board of the Oceano Community Services District, one of the agencies he sued. “There’s no way I can reopen my business with the flooding.”

Oceano Nursery is on Highway 1 at the corners of 13th and Paso Robles streets, where water pools during major storms, often flooding the business.

“It’s time that the county needs to be held accountable, and Caltrans, they will be held accountable, too,” Bookout added.

Advertisement

Bookout filed the lawsuit in 2006, alleging that the five entities had contributed to and caused continual flooding problems at his nursery over the years, which forced him to close the nursery’s doors.

The lawsuit, in part, claimed that over the years, the county has diverted storm water runoff to Highway 1, Caltrans has raised the level of the highway and OCSD has failed to properly maintain its drainage systems, which have all caused the nursery to flood repeatedly.

In early July, Tangeman oversaw a 10-day trial in the case that was triggered by a motion filed by Bookout’s attorneys for a judgment against the defendants for damages to the nursery.

Tangeman ruled that the evidence presented at trial failed to support a basis for liability on the part of the various agencies.

“In each of these cases, the court finds that the evidence is too speculative,” Tangeman wrote.

Tangeman said he also ruled in favor of the defendants because he believes the flooding problem stems from a much earlier date than what Bookout has contended.

“Although plaintiff strenuously and repeatedly argues that his property was not flooded prior to 2004, the evidence to the contrary is overwhelming,” Tangeman wrote.

During last month’s trial, Bookout settled with the Pismo/Oceano Vegetable Exchange for an undisclosed amount of money. Bookout declined to comment on that settlement.

August 7, 2008