CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTION INFO. LETTER TO THE EDITOR BUY! PHOTOS GAS PRICES FREE GAMES! TV LISTINGS EMAIL UPDATES  Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

ARCHIVES

Currently
64°
Clear
Click for more Weather Info

MARKETPLACE

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7









OWN A PIECE OF HISTORY


Advertisement


ARCHIVES

Grover Beach hotel stopped

Members of the California Coastal Commission said Friday that a hotel approved by the Grover Beach City Council for the corner of Highway 1 and West Grand Avenue cannot be built without another hearing before the state panel.

The Coastal Commission made the de facto decision Friday by taking no action during a three-day meeting in San Diego.

Jonathan Bishop, a coastal program analyst for the commission, said since none of the commissioners chose to open up the appeal for discussion, it is assumed that the appeal - by two members of the commission - raised substantial issues with the project.

The hotel is now on hold until the commission holds a “de novo” hearing on the project, at a date yet to be determined, Bishop said.

A de novo hearing will essentially review the entire project from the beginning, with the commission now in control of the necessary coastal development permit.

The 20-unit condominium/hotel project was approved Sept. 17 by the City Council after it had been revised a number of times at the request of Grover Beach officials as well as Coastal Commission staff.

In addition to the condominium/hotel aspect, the project includes five first-floor retail spaces - one designated for a cafe - and a 37-space underground parking garage, as well as an observation tower.

Advertisement

Ron Perkins, chief executive officer of IGIT Inc., the Grover Beach company developing the project, said earlier this month he was “not surprised at all” by the appeal.

However, he said he sent

his entire staff to meet with the Coastal Commission

staff a year and a half ago,

and his staff believed they

had designed the project within commission guidelines.

But commission Chairman Patrick Kruer and April Vargas, alternate for Commissioner Sara Wan, appealed the project, claiming it is not an allowable use for the site and encroaches on environmentally sensitive habitat with no definite plan to mitigate its impacts.

They also claim the project does not adequately address potential impacts on marine resources and coastal water quality, will block scenic views, is out of character with the community and fails to include an analysis of its impacts on available city services.

Associate editor Mike Hodgson can be reached at 739-2221 or mhodgson@santamariatimes.com.

November 17, 2007


POST A COMMENT

Comment policy:
SantaMariaTimes.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:

  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.

Please view our Commenting Policy

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments.

 
Current Word Count:
   

No comments posted.




SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES

  
Advanced Search





Translate to another language

Lee Central Coast Newspapers

Santa Maria Times Lompoc Record Times Press Recorder Adobe Press Santa Ynez Valley News El Tiempo

Letter to the Editor | Comment about Website

Contact The Santa Maria Times
Main Phone: 805-925-2691
Toll Free: 1-800-404-0009

Copyright © 2009 Lee Central Coast Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Lee Central Coast Newspapers pages are designed for Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 6 or 7 with screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click here for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.