CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTION INFO. LETTER TO THE EDITOR BUY! PHOTOS GAS PRICES FREE GAMES! TV LISTINGS EMAIL UPDATES  Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

ARCHIVES

Currently
66°
Clear
Click for more Weather Info

MARKETPLACE

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7









OWN A PIECE OF HISTORY


Advertisement


ARCHIVES

Grover Beach poised to restrict sex offenders

The Grover Beach City Council may adopt a fairly strict ordinance Monday limiting where registered sex offenders who molested children can reside in the city.

If the council passes the ordinance, it would prohibit sex offenders whose victims were children from living within 1,000 feet of schools, parks and licensed daycare centers.

The proposed ordinance - the first of its kind in the city - passed its first hurdle Jan. 22 when the council unanimously approved the first reading of the new law.

“It's very important that we provide staff with the tools to help keep this community safe,” Councilman and Mayor Pro Tem John Shoals said during the Jan. 22 meeting.

State law prevents registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of schools or parks, and Grover's proposed ordinance goes even further, preventing them from living near daycare centers.

“Where it gets to be more restrictive is with the licensed daycare centers; the state law doesn't provide for that,” Grover City Manager Bob Perrault said. “That's the primary difference (between the state's law and Grover's ordinance).”

Perrault added that because of Grover's size, the ordinance could only restrict where sex offenders can live up to 1,000 feet from sensitive sites.

Advertisement

California voters passed Proposition 83, also known as Jessica's Law, in November 2006, which also requires paroled sex offenders to wear electronic tracking devices for life.

Additionally, Grover Beach's ordinance also restricts where sex offenders whose victims were children can live in the city even after they've completed all terms and conditions of their parole.

“We don't have an existing ordinance (regulating where sex offenders can live); most cities don't,” said Grover Police Chief Jim Copsey. “This will be a brand-new ordinance. It does give us more restrictions ... and lets us identify specific parks and other locations.”

Unless any substantial changes are made to the ordinance, Monday's second reading and final vote is mostly a formality, according to city staff.

The ordinance provides a mechanism for the City Council to annually review, by resolution, sites in the city that have been identified as sensitive areas where sex offenders cannot reside, Perrault said.

Sex offenders already living within city limits will be grandfathered in under the new ordinance until they move.

Grover Beach will be the second city in the county to expand on the state's restrictions for sex offenders and where they can reside in city limits.

Last February, Paso Robles passed an ordinance that only allows registered sex offenders to live in a few small areas of the city.

April Charlton can be reached at 489-4206, Ext. 5016, or acharlton@santamariatimes.com.

Feb. 3, 2007


POST A COMMENT

Comment policy:
SantaMariaTimes.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:

  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.

Please view our Commenting Policy

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments.

 
Current Word Count:
   

2 comment(s)

Louise wrote on Feb 3, 2007 9:19 AM:

" Enacting legislation that restricts where those forced to register as sex offenders does nothing to protect children. Sadly, the longer this senseless, hysteria generated hatefulness is allowed to propagate in our state the longer it will be before children- who are at risk for sexual abuse - will receive the protections they deserve. Instead of blindly following after what politicians say, why don't you check out sites like the United States Department of Justice Bureau of Statistics, and SOhopeful International and educate yourself to the facts. Some of the facts you will discover are, over 90% of victims child sexual abuse know their abuser. The abuse is not perpetrated by a stranger in over 90% of the time!! Over 90% of those convicted of sex crime have NEVER been convicted before of a sex crime.(So, in most cases, the registry did nothing to protect children) And- the re-offense rate for sex offenders is very low. Only 3.5%! The facts are there and until they are used to enact real protection for our children, we will continue to have children sexually abused. Our kids are depending on us to get it right. If the facts put out by the US DOJ say that over 90% of child sexual abuse is NOT committed at the hand of a stranger, why do we treat all sex offenders like they lurking in the park wating for their next victim to pass by? Most forced to register as sex offenders obey the law and register. They, for the most part are not who we should worry about. As parents you need to be more concerned about Uncle Harry always patting little Susie or always wanting her to sit on his lap. You should worry about about your pastor, priest, teacher or coach and look closely at the time your child spends alone with these people. These people, people you know and people your child knows are the real threat to your child. Continuing to relentlessly take away the jobs and homes of those forced to register is mean spirited and misses the mark by miles and miles. "

Mak wrote on Feb 6, 2007 12:42 PM:

" By no means an advocate for sex-offenders but banishing these guys from society, taking their jobs, homes, families, and any dignity they may have to live homeless, helpless, unsupervised outcasts does not sound safer to me. Why don't we learn the lessons of Iowa? as they are fighting to repeal the failed restrictions we are voting for it. You cant sweep the problem under the carpet and think it doesn't exist. The snatch and grab offender is very rare yet we are fueled by those few stories and ostracize these guys for life. In my opinion we are just emboldening the enemy. "





SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES

  
Advanced Search





Translate to another language

Lee Central Coast Newspapers

Santa Maria Times Lompoc Record Times Press Recorder Adobe Press Santa Ynez Valley News El Tiempo

Letter to the Editor | Comment about Website

Contact The Santa Maria Times
Main Phone: 805-925-2691
Toll Free: 1-800-404-0009

Copyright © 2009 Lee Central Coast Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Lee Central Coast Newspapers pages are designed for Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 6 or 7 with screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click here for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.