CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTION INFO. LETTER TO THE EDITOR BUY! PHOTOS GAS PRICES FREE GAMES! TV LISTINGS EMAIL UPDATES  Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

ARCHIVES

Currently
52°
Partly Cloudy
Click for more Weather Info

MARKETPLACE

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7









OWN A PIECE OF HISTORY


Advertisement


ARCHIVES

Measure D: Building for the future

The future of Santa Barbara County's street, road and transportation systems will be in the hands of voters on Nov. 7.

County officials are seeking renewal of Measure D, which voters first approved in 1989, and which has provided about $350 million over the years for better streets, roads and transit systems. The renewal amounts to keeping the half-cent sales tax that has been in effect since 1989, plus adding another 1/4-cent, both of which will be on the books for another 30 years.

A renewal of the modified Measure D would generate nearly $1.6 billion during the life of the tax, all of which would be used to improve roads and to figure out better ways to move greater numbers of people around the county - without the rush-hour traffic jams that are endemic in the southern part of the county, and growing increasingly so here in the North County.

One of the questions you may hear in the weeks approaching the election is why the county needs a special tax to support road maintenance and transportation projects, when the state will have on the same ballot a measure to raise billions for the same purposes statewide. In fact, Santa Barbara County's share of that statewide bond would amount to, at the very most, about $200 million, and it could easily turn out to be a third that much.

No, if county voters want better roads and better transit systems, we need to make the arrangements ourselves. Depending on state government for financial help has, in the past, proven to be an extremely chancy proposition.

The first Measure D has not been perfect, and the renewed version has some potential drawbacks as well. But few governmental initiatives are perfect. This one at least raises a great deal of money, and lists specific categories of projects on which the money is to be spent.

What's truly remarkable is that a broad cross-section of governmental and community leaders have reached agreement on this measure, which has huge implications for every community in the county. Santa Maria is due to receive $173.5 million in renewed Measure D funds; Lompoc, $83.5 million; Guadalupe, $13.7 million; and Buellton and Solvang, a combined $22.3 million.

Advertisement

Most of the opposition seems to be based on pure politics, strong anti-government feelings or an unwillingness to compromise.

No one likes taxes, but the fact is Measure D offers voters a chance to approve a tax with confidence and knowledge about how the dollars will be spent. Measure D will allow for improvements to our roadway infrastructure, allowing cities and the county to keep pace with road repair and maintenance needs. It also will give a boost to mass transit projects that inevitably must be a part of our transportation future.

The issues with Measure D are simple: If you want road construction to keep pace with population and traffic growth, if you want potholes repaired and roads maintained before they deteriorate further, if you want expanded mass-transit service, you should support this tax on Nov. 7.

And if you decide to vote against it, you should understand that congestion will increase, as our road system will not be expanded. Many streets and highways will go unrepaired and deteriorate further. Mass transit will not be expanded to meet the growing needs.

Some folks point to Sacramento and assert that expanding roads - particularly state highways and freeways - is a state responsibility and therefore should be paid for by the state. We don't necessarily disagree, but given the state's history of budget problems, looking to the state for the fix is heading down a road to nowhere.

Measure D has worked for the past 17 years - perhaps not perfectly, but it has worked. The citizens of Santa Barbara County would be well-served to approve this renewal.

Aug. 27, 2006


POST A COMMENT

Comment policy:
SantaMariaTimes.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:

  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.

Please view our Commenting Policy

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments.

 
Current Word Count:
   

2 comment(s)

Donna McCoy wrote on Aug 27, 2006 1:54 PM:

" I was one of the voters who approved Measure D w/the understanding it would be presented for renewal in 20 years. I would like to vote for renewal, but now I'm being told I cannot do as promised unless I also vote to increase the tax by 25%... feels like blackmail, and I don't like it. "

Bob James wrote on Oct 2, 2006 8:42 AM:

" I would support this measure if it would escrow 100% of the non-101 freeway widening money until it is certain that the 101 will actually get widened this time! As it stands, I oppose this measure, because the money is divided into too many projects to assure that there is enough money and political support to actually widen the freeway as it should have been done 50 years ago! "





SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES

  
Advanced Search





Translate to another language

Lee Central Coast Newspapers

Santa Maria Times Lompoc Record Times Press Recorder Adobe Press Santa Ynez Valley News El Tiempo

Letter to the Editor | Comment about Website

Contact The Santa Maria Times
Main Phone: 805-925-2691
Toll Free: 1-800-404-0009

Copyright © 2009 Lee Central Coast Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Lee Central Coast Newspapers pages are designed for Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 6 or 7 with screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click here for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.